+130.9%
MS vs MSTZ
-99.3%
+230.2%
-29.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +2.6% | -2.4% | +0.4% |
| 7D | +1.4% | -29.7% | +31.1% | -0.4% |
| 30D | -0.3% | -65.3% | +65.0% | -5.9% |
| 3M | +0.3% | -57.3% | +57.6% | -2.3% |
| 6M | +31.3% | -61.6% | +93.0% | +29.0% |
| YTD | +24.7% | -78.3% | +102.9% | +21.6% |
| 1Y | +47.9% | -30.2% | +78.2% | +60.0% |
| All | +130.9% | -99.3% | +230.2% | +111.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling