+160.4%
MS vs LNT
+57.3%
+103.1%
-29.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -1.0% | +0.5% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -1.6% | +1.4% | -3.0% | -1.8% |
| 30D | -3.8% | +12.3% | -16.1% | -6.1% |
| 3M | -14.6% | +5.3% | -19.9% | -15.6% |
| 6M | -5.1% | +2.0% | -7.1% | -5.8% |
| YTD | +4.5% | +15.3% | -10.8% | -0.8% |
| 1Y | +13.5% | +12.3% | +1.3% | +8.7% |
| 3Y | +160.4% | +59.1% | +101.3% | +113.1% |
| All | +160.4% | +57.3% | +103.1% | +113.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling