+65.2%
MS vs KRMN
+33.3%
+31.9%
-29.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -1.3% | +1.6% | +0.5% |
| 7D | +1.4% | -12.3% | +13.6% | +3.7% |
| 30D | -0.3% | -27.5% | +27.2% | +5.3% |
| 3M | +0.3% | -26.5% | +26.8% | +4.9% |
| 6M | +31.3% | -59.6% | +90.9% | +51.3% |
| YTD | +24.7% | -45.4% | +70.0% | +32.4% |
| 1Y | +47.9% | -25.1% | +73.0% | +42.9% |
| All | +65.2% | +33.3% | +31.9% | +19.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling