+181.3%
MS vs FROG
+198.7%
-17.3%
-29.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -3.3% | +3.6% | +0.7% |
| 7D | +1.4% | -11.3% | +12.7% | +2.8% |
| 30D | -0.3% | +3.6% | -3.9% | -1.0% |
| 3M | +0.3% | +1.7% | -1.4% | -0.5% |
| 6M | +31.3% | +123.5% | -92.2% | +16.8% |
| YTD | +24.7% | +40.2% | -15.6% | +16.9% |
| 1Y | +47.9% | +81.0% | -33.1% | +32.5% |
| All | +181.3% | +198.7% | -17.3% | +115.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling