+321.2%
MRVL vs ZM
+34.4%
+286.8%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -0.3% | +4.5% | +4.3% |
| 7D | +13.8% | +0.3% | +13.5% | +13.7% |
| 30D | +12.7% | -10.3% | +23.0% | +16.2% |
| 3M | -11.9% | -0.7% | -11.2% | -12.2% |
| 6M | +153.8% | +24.8% | +129.0% | +130.2% |
| YTD | +177.0% | +11.5% | +165.5% | +159.8% |
| 1Y | +252.3% | +12.3% | +240.0% | +227.9% |
| All | +321.2% | +34.4% | +286.8% | +255.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling