+252.5%
MRVL vs VIK
+228.1%
+24.3%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VIK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.0% | +0.3% | +6.8% | +6.9% |
| 7D | +3.2% | -3.0% | +6.2% | +5.2% |
| 30D | +5.9% | -20.7% | +26.7% | +21.5% |
| 3M | -29.3% | -4.6% | -24.7% | -27.6% |
| 6M | +186.5% | +14.0% | +172.5% | +154.3% |
| YTD | +163.4% | +20.2% | +143.3% | +122.5% |
| 1Y | +249.5% | +36.0% | +213.5% | +164.4% |
| All | +252.5% | +228.1% | +24.3% | +57.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VIK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VIK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VIK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VIK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling