+186.5%
MRVL vs VFC
-28.1%
+214.6%
-48.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | VFC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.0% | +2.4% | +4.7% | +6.6% |
| 7D | +3.2% | -1.6% | +4.8% | +3.5% |
| 30D | +5.9% | -11.6% | +17.6% | +8.3% |
| 3M | -29.3% | -18.1% | -11.2% | -26.6% |
| 6M | +186.5% | -27.4% | +213.8% | +202.4% |
| All | +186.5% | -28.1% | +214.6% | +202.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VFC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VFC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VFC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VFC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling