+321.2%
MRVL vs TRGP
+261.7%
+59.4%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -1.0% | +5.2% | +4.7% |
| 7D | +13.8% | -0.7% | +14.5% | +14.1% |
| 30D | +12.7% | +9.5% | +3.2% | +7.0% |
| 3M | -11.9% | +10.8% | -22.7% | -18.0% |
| 6M | +153.8% | +25.3% | +128.5% | +118.2% |
| YTD | +177.0% | +60.3% | +116.7% | +102.5% |
| 1Y | +252.3% | +84.6% | +167.8% | +132.0% |
| All | +321.2% | +261.7% | +59.4% | +147.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling