+306.7%
MRVL vs RSG
+56.5%
+250.2%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | RSG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.4% | -0.6% | -2.8% | -3.6% |
| 7D | +8.7% | -1.8% | +10.5% | +8.0% |
| 30D | +6.9% | +2.8% | +4.1% | +8.0% |
| 3M | -10.1% | +4.3% | -14.4% | -8.5% |
| 6M | +143.4% | -0.5% | +144.0% | +149.0% |
| YTD | +167.5% | +5.2% | +162.2% | +171.8% |
| 1Y | +239.0% | -2.1% | +241.1% | +248.7% |
| All | +306.7% | +56.5% | +250.2% | +327.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RSG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RSG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RSG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RSG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling