+106.0%
MRVL vs PLTD
-77.8%
+183.8%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.0% | +4.6% | +2.4% | +8.7% |
| 7D | +3.2% | +5.9% | -2.7% | +5.5% |
| 30D | +5.9% | -11.6% | +17.5% | +1.7% |
| 3M | -29.3% | -29.9% | +0.6% | -35.1% |
| 6M | +186.5% | -28.5% | +215.0% | +166.5% |
| YTD | +163.4% | -20.4% | +183.8% | +160.1% |
| 1Y | +249.5% | -33.3% | +282.8% | +224.0% |
| All | +106.0% | -77.8% | +183.8% | +24.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling