0.0%
MRVL vs PFGC
+16.8%
-16.8%
-57.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | -1.1% | -1.5% | -3.5% |
| 7D | +23.1% | +0.3% | +22.9% | +22.9% |
| 30D | -38.8% | +16.1% | -54.9% | -28.7% |
| 3M | -24.2% | +2.4% | -26.6% | -26.5% |
| 6M | 0.0% | +15.7% | -15.7% | +52.6% |
| All | 0.0% | +16.8% | -16.8% | +52.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling