+186.5%
MRVL vs PCG
-24.3%
+210.8%
-48.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | PCG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.0% | +2.4% | +4.6% | +6.6% |
| 7D | +3.2% | -13.9% | +17.1% | +5.6% |
| 30D | +5.9% | -16.9% | +22.8% | +10.4% |
| 3M | -29.3% | -14.7% | -14.6% | -26.9% |
| 6M | +186.5% | -23.8% | +210.3% | +228.4% |
| All | +186.5% | -24.3% | +210.8% | +228.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PCG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PCG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PCG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PCG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling