+82.7%
MRVL vs PCG
-14.1%
+96.8%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PCG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.1% | +0.8% | -7.9% | -7.2% |
| 7D | -36.5% | +1.9% | -38.4% | -36.7% |
| 30D | -41.1% | +8.5% | -49.6% | -41.7% |
| 3M | -26.9% | -22.9% | -4.0% | -24.7% |
| 6M | -2.3% | -16.8% | +14.4% | -1.0% |
| YTD | +88.4% | -15.8% | +104.1% | +98.2% |
| 1Y | +82.7% | -16.0% | +98.7% | +97.1% |
| All | +82.7% | -14.1% | +96.8% | +97.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PCG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PCG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PCG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PCG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling