+210.3%
MRVL vs NOC
+24.4%
+185.8%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NOC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | -0.3% | -2.2% | -2.7% |
| 7D | +23.1% | +4.5% | +18.6% | +24.5% |
| 30D | -38.8% | +14.1% | -52.9% | -36.4% |
| 3M | -24.2% | -4.5% | -19.8% | -24.5% |
| 6M | 0.0% | -0.8% | +0.8% | +1.2% |
| YTD | +93.8% | -2.5% | +96.4% | +98.8% |
| 1Y | +84.4% | -0.1% | +84.5% | +90.2% |
| All | +210.3% | +24.4% | +185.8% | +253.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NOC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NOC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NOC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NOC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling