+321.2%
MRVL vs NOC
+28.0%
+293.1%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NOC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -0.6% | +4.8% | +4.1% |
| 7D | +13.8% | -1.6% | +15.4% | +13.4% |
| 30D | +12.7% | -10.4% | +23.1% | +10.1% |
| 3M | -11.9% | -5.6% | -6.3% | -12.6% |
| 6M | +153.8% | -30.4% | +184.2% | +143.2% |
| YTD | +177.0% | -8.5% | +185.4% | +177.6% |
| 1Y | +252.3% | -8.3% | +260.7% | +254.2% |
| All | +321.2% | +28.0% | +293.1% | +351.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NOC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NOC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NOC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NOC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling