+218.5%
MRVL vs MTB
+105.4%
+113.1%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.3% | -0.2% | +9.5% | +9.4% |
| 7D | +5.6% | -2.0% | +7.6% | +7.0% |
| 30D | -36.5% | +0.1% | -36.6% | -36.6% |
| 3M | -20.5% | -12.1% | -8.4% | -15.0% |
| 6M | -1.1% | +7.3% | -8.4% | -7.8% |
| YTD | +99.0% | +11.5% | +87.4% | +79.6% |
| 1Y | +89.3% | +21.3% | +68.0% | +61.4% |
| All | +218.5% | +105.4% | +113.1% | +95.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling