+89.3%
MRVL vs LSCC
+83.9%
+5.4%
-57.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.3% | +10.4% | -1.0% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +5.6% | +14.5% | -8.8% | -4.3% |
| 30D | -36.5% | -0.1% | -36.5% | -36.5% |
| 3M | -20.5% | -2.7% | -17.8% | -19.3% |
| 6M | -1.1% | -4.8% | +3.7% | +9.2% |
| YTD | +99.0% | +66.9% | +32.1% | +63.8% |
| 1Y | +89.3% | +85.8% | +3.4% | +44.7% |
| All | +89.3% | +83.9% | +5.4% | +44.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling