+249.5%
MRVL vs LSCC
+72.9%
+176.6%
-48.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.0% | +2.0% | +5.1% | +5.6% |
| 7D | +3.2% | +1.3% | +1.9% | +2.2% |
| 30D | +5.9% | -9.7% | +15.6% | +14.1% |
| 3M | -29.3% | -23.7% | -5.6% | -12.9% |
| 6M | +186.5% | +26.5% | +160.0% | +184.9% |
| YTD | +163.4% | +57.5% | +105.9% | +131.0% |
| 1Y | +249.5% | +75.7% | +173.8% | +203.5% |
| All | +249.5% | +72.9% | +176.6% | +203.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling