+306.7%
MRVL vs LQD
+14.2%
+292.6%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LQD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.4% | -0.9% | -2.5% | -2.0% |
| 7D | +8.7% | -1.1% | +9.8% | +10.5% |
| 30D | +6.9% | -1.1% | +8.0% | +8.9% |
| 3M | -10.1% | -2.3% | -7.8% | -6.6% |
| 6M | +143.4% | -2.9% | +146.3% | +155.8% |
| YTD | +167.5% | -2.3% | +169.8% | +178.9% |
| 1Y | +239.0% | -2.2% | +241.1% | +252.7% |
| All | +306.7% | +14.2% | +292.6% | +259.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LQD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LQD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LQD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LQD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling