+321.2%
MRVL vs LMT
+34.6%
+286.6%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LMT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -2.2% | +6.4% | +3.8% |
| 7D | +13.8% | -1.3% | +15.2% | +13.6% |
| 30D | +12.7% | -12.5% | +25.2% | +10.0% |
| 3M | -11.9% | -0.5% | -11.5% | -11.8% |
| 6M | +153.8% | -20.0% | +173.9% | +150.9% |
| YTD | +177.0% | +10.4% | +166.6% | +186.7% |
| 1Y | +252.3% | +17.7% | +234.6% | +269.8% |
| All | +321.2% | +34.6% | +286.6% | +355.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LMT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LMT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LMT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LMT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling