+162.8%
MRVL vs LDOS
+35.4%
+127.4%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -16.4% | +0.1% | -16.5% | -16.4% |
| 7D | -38.8% | -3.7% | -35.1% | -38.7% |
| 30D | -53.5% | +16.4% | -69.8% | -54.2% |
| 3M | -36.7% | +7.4% | -44.1% | -37.3% |
| 6M | -20.8% | -0.3% | -20.5% | -19.7% |
| YTD | +57.4% | -24.0% | +81.4% | +69.2% |
| 1Y | +44.0% | -29.6% | +73.6% | +58.2% |
| All | +162.8% | +35.4% | +127.4% | +145.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling