+162.8%
MRVL vs HTZ
-81.0%
+243.8%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -16.4% | -20.8% | +4.4% | -14.5% |
| 7D | -38.8% | -7.7% | -31.1% | -38.3% |
| 30D | -53.5% | -13.1% | -40.4% | -52.9% |
| 3M | -36.7% | +14.7% | -51.4% | -38.0% |
| 6M | -20.8% | -70.6% | +49.8% | -14.4% |
| YTD | +57.4% | -65.2% | +122.6% | +66.9% |
| 1Y | +44.0% | -73.2% | +117.2% | +55.2% |
| All | +162.8% | -81.0% | +243.8% | +191.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling