+289.8%
MRVL vs GD
+68.4%
+221.4%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.0% | -1.8% | +8.8% | +7.6% |
| 7D | +3.2% | -5.3% | +8.5% | +4.8% |
| 30D | +5.9% | -6.4% | +12.4% | +7.8% |
| 3M | -29.3% | +5.7% | -35.0% | -31.3% |
| 6M | +186.5% | -0.9% | +187.4% | +186.1% |
| YTD | +163.4% | +8.2% | +155.3% | +152.8% |
| 1Y | +249.5% | +13.4% | +236.1% | +229.0% |
| All | +289.8% | +68.4% | +221.4% | +238.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling