+162.8%
MRVL vs GD
+55.3%
+107.5%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -16.4% | -2.3% | -14.1% | -15.8% |
| 7D | -38.8% | -3.9% | -34.9% | -38.2% |
| 30D | -53.5% | +8.1% | -61.5% | -54.5% |
| 3M | -36.7% | -6.8% | -29.9% | -35.3% |
| 6M | -20.8% | +3.0% | -23.8% | -22.6% |
| YTD | +57.4% | +7.8% | +49.7% | +50.3% |
| 1Y | +44.0% | +5.8% | +38.2% | +38.8% |
| All | +162.8% | +55.3% | +107.5% | +118.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling