+210.3%
MRVL vs FITB
+141.3%
+68.9%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FITB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | -0.9% | -1.7% | -2.0% |
| 7D | +23.1% | +0.8% | +22.3% | +22.7% |
| 30D | -38.8% | +7.3% | -46.1% | -41.3% |
| 3M | -24.2% | -6.3% | -17.9% | -21.7% |
| 6M | 0.0% | +12.6% | -12.5% | -9.2% |
| YTD | +93.8% | +18.0% | +75.9% | +68.3% |
| 1Y | +84.4% | +28.9% | +55.5% | +50.5% |
| All | +210.3% | +141.3% | +68.9% | +86.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FITB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FITB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FITB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FITB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling