+178.7%
MRVL vs FIG
-71.6%
+250.4%
-48.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FIG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.0% | -4.4% | +11.4% | +6.8% |
| 7D | +3.2% | -16.3% | +19.5% | +2.2% |
| 30D | +5.9% | -14.3% | +20.3% | +5.4% |
| 3M | -29.3% | +7.2% | -36.5% | -27.8% |
| 6M | +186.5% | -18.6% | +205.1% | +195.7% |
| YTD | +163.4% | -35.5% | +198.9% | +175.4% |
| 1Y | +249.5% | -55.8% | +305.3% | +274.5% |
| All | +178.7% | -71.6% | +250.4% | +183.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FIG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FIG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FIG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FIG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling