+210.3%
MRVL vs FE
+49.1%
+161.2%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FE | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | -0.1% | -2.5% | -2.6% |
| 7D | +23.1% | -0.3% | +23.4% | +23.0% |
| 30D | -38.8% | +3.9% | -42.7% | -37.7% |
| 3M | -24.2% | -0.1% | -24.1% | -24.1% |
| 6M | 0.0% | +6.1% | -6.1% | +2.7% |
| YTD | +93.8% | +8.1% | +85.8% | +101.4% |
| 1Y | +84.4% | +4.4% | +80.0% | +89.6% |
| All | +210.3% | +49.1% | +161.2% | +236.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FE.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FE return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FE return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FE wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling