+241.8%
MRVL vs FBTC
+65.3%
+176.5%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FBTC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.0% | -2.5% | +9.6% | +7.9% |
| 7D | +3.2% | +2.9% | +0.3% | +2.0% |
| 30D | +5.9% | +23.0% | -17.1% | -1.8% |
| 3M | -29.3% | +25.6% | -54.9% | -34.6% |
| 6M | +186.5% | +9.0% | +177.5% | +175.1% |
| YTD | +163.4% | -8.9% | +172.4% | +166.9% |
| 1Y | +249.5% | -27.5% | +277.0% | +283.4% |
| All | +241.8% | +65.3% | +176.5% | +205.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FBTC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FBTC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FBTC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FBTC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling