+321.2%
MRVL vs ENTG
+48.2%
+273.0%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | +1.4% | +2.9% | +3.3% |
| 7D | +13.8% | +8.9% | +4.9% | +7.3% |
| 30D | +12.7% | -0.8% | +13.5% | +13.0% |
| 3M | -11.9% | +6.6% | -18.5% | -15.2% |
| 6M | +153.8% | +22.1% | +131.8% | +125.4% |
| YTD | +177.0% | +70.2% | +106.8% | +89.1% |
| 1Y | +252.3% | +76.7% | +175.6% | +128.1% |
| All | +321.2% | +48.2% | +273.0% | +204.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling