+195.7%
MRVL vs ENPH
-66.2%
+262.0%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENPH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.7% | -2.7% | -2.0% | -4.0% |
| 7D | +11.0% | -8.4% | +19.4% | +13.6% |
| 30D | -36.1% | -11.2% | -24.9% | -34.8% |
| 3M | -29.4% | -36.1% | +6.6% | -21.5% |
| 6M | -11.9% | -37.9% | +26.1% | +1.6% |
| YTD | +84.8% | -18.7% | +103.4% | +98.6% |
| 1Y | +79.4% | -9.8% | +89.2% | +88.9% |
| 3Y | +195.7% | -66.8% | +262.6% | +245.4% |
| All | +195.7% | -66.2% | +262.0% | +245.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENPH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENPH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENPH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENPH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling