+304.8%
MRVL vs ENB
+78.2%
+226.6%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.0% | -0.9% | +7.9% | +7.2% |
| 7D | +3.2% | -0.2% | +3.4% | +3.2% |
| 30D | +5.9% | -2.2% | +8.2% | +6.2% |
| 3M | -29.3% | -10.5% | -18.8% | -28.0% |
| 6M | +186.5% | -5.1% | +191.6% | +187.4% |
| YTD | +163.4% | +9.0% | +154.5% | +156.1% |
| 1Y | +249.5% | +8.2% | +241.3% | +240.0% |
| All | +304.8% | +78.2% | +226.6% | +222.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling