+304.8%
MRVL vs DAR
+11.6%
+293.2%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DAR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.0% | -0.9% | +7.9% | +7.3% |
| 7D | +3.2% | +1.4% | +1.8% | +2.8% |
| 30D | +5.9% | +12.8% | -6.8% | +2.2% |
| 3M | -29.3% | +7.4% | -36.7% | -30.9% |
| 6M | +186.5% | +22.3% | +164.2% | +169.5% |
| YTD | +163.4% | +81.1% | +82.4% | +121.8% |
| 1Y | +249.5% | +106.5% | +143.0% | +180.9% |
| All | +304.8% | +11.6% | +293.2% | +273.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DAR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DAR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DAR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DAR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling