+321.2%
MRVL vs BTG
+99.9%
+221.3%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | +1.7% | +2.6% | +3.8% |
| 7D | +13.8% | +2.4% | +11.4% | +13.0% |
| 30D | +12.7% | +9.5% | +3.2% | +9.8% |
| 3M | -11.9% | +38.5% | -50.4% | -20.1% |
| 6M | +153.8% | +5.6% | +148.2% | +145.4% |
| YTD | +177.0% | +23.9% | +153.0% | +157.4% |
| 1Y | +252.3% | +32.1% | +220.2% | +219.0% |
| All | +321.2% | +99.9% | +221.3% | +230.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling