+321.2%
MRVL vs BLDR
-56.4%
+377.5%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -1.9% | +6.2% | +4.8% |
| 7D | +13.8% | -2.7% | +16.5% | +14.7% |
| 30D | +12.7% | -14.7% | +27.4% | +17.8% |
| 3M | -11.9% | -20.8% | +8.9% | -6.2% |
| 6M | +153.8% | -35.3% | +189.2% | +184.5% |
| YTD | +177.0% | -40.3% | +217.3% | +214.3% |
| 1Y | +252.3% | -56.3% | +308.6% | +337.8% |
| All | +321.2% | -56.4% | +377.5% | +387.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling