+321.2%
MRVL vs BIIB
-19.0%
+340.2%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -0.8% | +5.1% | +4.4% |
| 7D | +13.8% | -5.4% | +19.2% | +14.5% |
| 30D | +12.7% | +1.7% | +10.9% | +12.4% |
| 3M | -11.9% | +5.8% | -17.8% | -13.0% |
| 6M | +153.8% | +11.9% | +141.9% | +146.5% |
| YTD | +177.0% | +19.7% | +157.2% | +163.7% |
| 1Y | +252.3% | +46.7% | +205.6% | +217.7% |
| All | +321.2% | -19.0% | +340.2% | +322.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling