+136.7%
MPWR vs GLDM
+128.8%
+8.0%
-51.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -0.9% | +1.7% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -2.6% | -0.5% | -2.0% | -2.3% |
| 30D | -9.0% | +4.4% | -13.4% | -11.0% |
| 3M | -25.8% | -1.1% | -24.8% | -25.5% |
| 6M | +11.8% | -13.7% | +25.4% | +18.4% |
| YTD | +35.5% | +2.8% | +32.7% | +33.9% |
| 1Y | +45.3% | +24.8% | +20.5% | +33.0% |
| All | +136.7% | +128.8% | +8.0% | +80.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling