+147.3%
MPWR vs ENTG
+44.2%
+103.1%
-51.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | +6.2% | -5.3% | -3.2% |
| 7D | -2.6% | +2.8% | -5.4% | -4.5% |
| 30D | -9.0% | -4.7% | -4.4% | -7.1% |
| 3M | -25.8% | -0.7% | -25.1% | -28.8% |
| 6M | +11.8% | +7.7% | +4.0% | -0.2% |
| YTD | +35.5% | +65.1% | -29.6% | -12.5% |
| 1Y | +45.3% | +74.8% | -29.5% | -13.3% |
| All | +147.3% | +44.2% | +103.1% | +66.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling