+180.6%
MPC vs FITB
+128.4%
+52.3%
-44.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FITB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -0.2% | +0.5% | +0.4% |
| 7D | +5.4% | +0.6% | +4.8% | +5.2% |
| 30D | +31.0% | -4.7% | +35.7% | +33.1% |
| 3M | +46.0% | +6.7% | +39.3% | +42.4% |
| 6M | +77.3% | +12.6% | +64.8% | +68.7% |
| YTD | +141.9% | +19.1% | +122.8% | +124.7% |
| 1Y | +120.9% | +22.6% | +98.3% | +102.1% |
| All | +180.6% | +128.4% | +52.3% | +120.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FITB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FITB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FITB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FITB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling