+153.3%
MP vs NIO
-64.6%
+217.9%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.4% | -1.6% | +2.9% | +1.9% |
| 7D | -2.9% | -13.0% | +10.2% | +1.2% |
| 30D | +13.8% | -18.3% | +32.1% | +20.9% |
| 3M | -16.7% | -33.2% | +16.5% | -6.1% |
| 6M | -11.5% | -21.5% | +10.0% | -6.1% |
| YTD | +7.9% | -25.5% | +33.4% | +15.5% |
| 1Y | -15.0% | -38.0% | +23.0% | -5.6% |
| All | +153.3% | -64.6% | +217.9% | +194.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling