+124.3%
MOD vs NIO
-62.1%
+186.5%
-70.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.3% | -3.0% | -4.2% | -6.8% |
| 7D | -34.2% | -3.6% | -30.5% | -33.8% |
| 30D | -51.9% | -8.0% | -43.8% | -51.2% |
| 3M | -53.0% | -31.2% | -21.9% | -50.2% |
| 6M | -66.4% | -45.8% | -20.6% | -63.1% |
| YTD | -31.5% | -37.3% | +5.7% | -27.2% |
| 1Y | -39.6% | -56.1% | +16.5% | -32.6% |
| All | +124.3% | -62.1% | +186.5% | +139.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling