+138.4%
MO vs FROG
+296.7%
-158.4%
-16.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | -4.3% | +5.0% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +17.0% | -17.8% | +0.2% |
| 30D | +6.5% | +1.3% | +5.2% | +7.1% |
| 3M | +18.3% | +17.5% | +0.9% | +19.7% |
| 6M | +15.6% | +46.8% | -31.2% | +17.9% |
| YTD | +38.8% | +65.8% | -27.0% | +42.6% |
| 1Y | +41.6% | +61.0% | -19.4% | +45.4% |
| All | +138.4% | +296.7% | -158.4% | +140.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling