+91.9%
MO vs EAT
+587.9%
-496.0%
-16.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -3.2% | +2.8% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -6.8% | +4.4% | -2.4% |
| 30D | +3.6% | -5.4% | +9.0% | +3.6% |
| 3M | -3.7% | +42.8% | -46.5% | -3.7% |
| 6M | +4.5% | +56.5% | -52.0% | +4.4% |
| YTD | +21.5% | +50.0% | -28.5% | +21.3% |
| 1Y | +9.5% | +38.3% | -28.7% | +9.2% |
| All | +91.9% | +587.9% | -496.0% | +64.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling