+106.1%
MO vs BTSG
+389.4%
-283.3%
-16.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BTSG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +1.5% | -1.2% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +0.1% | -3.3% | +3.4% | +0.1% |
| 30D | +7.1% | -1.6% | +8.7% | +7.1% |
| 3M | -2.0% | -6.9% | +4.9% | -2.1% |
| 6M | +7.3% | +42.1% | -34.8% | +7.8% |
| YTD | +23.5% | +56.8% | -33.4% | +23.9% |
| 1Y | +11.0% | +109.8% | -98.8% | +11.2% |
| All | +106.1% | +389.4% | -283.3% | +111.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BTSG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BTSG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BTSG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BTSG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling