+56.6%
MNST vs MET
+65.9%
-9.3%
-26.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MET | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -1.6% | +1.0% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -6.5% | +1.2% | -7.6% | -6.7% |
| 30D | -7.2% | +1.4% | -8.6% | -7.5% |
| 3M | -1.0% | +17.7% | -18.7% | -3.9% |
| 6M | +11.5% | +35.0% | -23.5% | +5.5% |
| YTD | +14.3% | +26.3% | -12.0% | +9.3% |
| 1Y | +38.1% | +22.8% | +15.3% | +32.5% |
| All | +56.6% | +65.9% | -9.3% | +36.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MET.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MET return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MET return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MET wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling