+103.3%
MNST vs FLNC
-67.0%
+170.3%
-26.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | +6.7% | -8.2% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -4.1% | +6.0% | -10.0% | -4.3% |
| 30D | -4.5% | -16.3% | +11.8% | -4.0% |
| 3M | -2.5% | -54.1% | +51.7% | -0.1% |
| 6M | +14.1% | -25.3% | +39.4% | +13.9% |
| YTD | +12.6% | -44.2% | +56.7% | +12.8% |
| 1Y | +36.9% | +53.1% | -16.2% | +29.7% |
| 3Y | +53.1% | -58.3% | +111.4% | +49.9% |
| All | +103.3% | -67.0% | +170.3% | +96.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling