+62.9%
MNST vs FITB
+123.2%
-60.3%
-26.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FITB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.4% | -0.8% | -3.6% | -4.3% |
| 7D | -3.4% | -1.5% | -1.9% | -3.2% |
| 30D | +6.6% | +5.8% | +0.8% | +5.8% |
| 3M | -2.9% | -6.1% | +3.2% | -2.1% |
| 6M | +18.4% | +5.9% | +12.5% | +17.7% |
| YTD | +19.3% | +16.1% | +3.2% | +17.0% |
| 1Y | +37.9% | +28.8% | +9.1% | +33.5% |
| 3Y | +62.9% | +126.0% | -63.1% | +49.4% |
| All | +62.9% | +123.2% | -60.3% | +49.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FITB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FITB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FITB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FITB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling