+73.7%
MNST vs DECK
-11.0%
+84.7%
-26.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.3% | +6.0% | -2.6% | +2.8% |
| 7D | +6.8% | +10.4% | -3.6% | +5.9% |
| 30D | +12.0% | +11.1% | +0.9% | +11.1% |
| 3M | +3.5% | -10.8% | +14.3% | +4.3% |
| 6M | +29.7% | -8.7% | +38.4% | +30.2% |
| YTD | +27.2% | -14.0% | +41.2% | +28.2% |
| 1Y | +45.8% | +12.0% | +33.8% | +44.7% |
| All | +73.7% | -11.0% | +84.7% | +73.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling