+63.5%
MNST vs BTG
+92.1%
-28.6%
-26.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -2.4% | +2.6% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -6.9% | +1.4% | -8.2% | -7.0% |
| 30D | +3.7% | -1.1% | +4.9% | +3.7% |
| 3M | -0.3% | +2.5% | -2.8% | -0.6% |
| 6M | +5.1% | -3.1% | +8.1% | +5.4% |
| YTD | +18.4% | +16.3% | +2.1% | +17.3% |
| 1Y | +26.3% | +27.6% | -1.3% | +24.5% |
| All | +63.5% | +92.1% | -28.6% | +59.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling