+37.9%
MNST vs ALHC
-56.7%
+94.6%
-17.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.4% | -2.9% | -1.5% | -4.4% |
| 7D | -3.4% | +1.0% | -4.4% | -3.4% |
| 30D | +6.6% | -14.2% | +20.8% | +6.8% |
| 3M | -2.9% | -45.1% | +42.3% | -2.7% |
| 6M | +18.4% | -59.5% | +78.0% | +19.0% |
| YTD | +19.3% | -62.8% | +82.1% | +21.0% |
| 1Y | +37.9% | -55.5% | +93.4% | +38.2% |
| All | +37.9% | -56.7% | +94.6% | +38.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling