+106.6%
MMM vs ZTS
-57.7%
+164.4%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -0.6% | +0.8% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -3.3% | -2.0% | -1.3% | -2.9% |
| 30D | -7.0% | +1.9% | -8.9% | -7.7% |
| 3M | +10.8% | -4.0% | +14.8% | +11.5% |
| 6M | +5.8% | -39.1% | +44.9% | +19.1% |
| YTD | +6.8% | -38.8% | +45.6% | +19.9% |
| 1Y | +10.4% | -49.6% | +60.0% | +30.8% |
| All | +106.6% | -57.7% | +164.4% | +168.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling