+97.9%
MMM vs PFGC
+61.7%
+36.2%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | -1.2% | -0.7% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -2.6% | -3.7% | +1.1% | -1.1% |
| 30D | -9.3% | -16.0% | +6.7% | -2.9% |
| 3M | +5.6% | -4.1% | +9.7% | +6.8% |
| 6M | +9.5% | +8.7% | +0.8% | +4.6% |
| YTD | +4.1% | +6.4% | -2.2% | -0.6% |
| 1Y | +9.4% | -8.4% | +17.8% | +11.9% |
| All | +97.9% | +61.7% | +36.2% | +48.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling