+104.9%
MMM vs NIO
-64.6%
+169.5%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -1.6% | +1.7% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -3.3% | -13.0% | +9.7% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -7.0% | -18.3% | +11.3% | -5.4% |
| 3M | +10.8% | -33.2% | +44.0% | +14.8% |
| 6M | +5.8% | -21.5% | +27.3% | +7.4% |
| YTD | +6.8% | -25.5% | +32.3% | +8.8% |
| 1Y | +10.4% | -38.0% | +48.4% | +13.8% |
| All | +104.9% | -64.6% | +169.5% | +116.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling